🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has adopted a corporate feel, expanding to include functions where African descendants are compensated to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since those days, focusing less on the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the warmer months we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is basic knowledge of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and adaptive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.